Nanowrimo 21650 and catching up.

I have to admit, this year’s NaNo has really suffered from my lack of bandwidth.

Going to the writein was far more helpful than I would have expected–not only did I write over 2k words at the write-in, it reminded me that if i just time myself and focus on spelling later, well, i can get a lot done.

In the end it is important to remember (at least for me) that… well I’m going to agonize over word choice at some point. Because that’s what I do. I didn’t write poetry for years for no reason at all.

But I don’t have to agonize over word choice at the beginning.

This is a story. Tell their story.

Agonize later.

NaNo 13k.

Been enjoying writing but struggling to fit time in. A couple new things this year:

– scenes are set up at five per chapter, each scene at 1000 word goal.
– as it’s a fantasy novella, I’ve added a section where I can write short (about 500 words) myths legends and fairy tales. These will not only be helpful for the story itself, but as they’re outside the narrative flow I can write them when I don’t have access to my scrivener files.

It’s started.

As one of about sixteen people in all of Montclair who did not lose power… well, I’m lucky. Also, I do wish I could have started oh say a week early?

But NaNo has started, and even though I was out much of the weekend I did manage to not get too far behind (even if i’m not ahead).

Managed to figure out a way to approach the fantasy series without boring myself. Problem: this is set up as a novella series. Which means that 50k is on the high side. Still I feel like doing two at 25k is a bit slow. I’ll have to see how it goes.

Heck if I do 35k of story and 15k of world building to be excised later I think I’ll be doing good.

This one even has a working title!

NaNoWriMo 2012

I am doing my setup for this year’s NaNo and am wondering if it would be better this year to just write for a certain amount of time.

How far behind would I get, were I to do it time based rather than word based?

Foyle’s War

Been watching Foyle’s War, cause, you know, umm… research?

What I find interesting about it is that it truly highlights the contemporary subtext of detective-as-priest; moreover, I find it interesting that the driver character’s actual father is an actual vicar, and her surrogate father is a surrogate priest.

At one point there is even a moment where he talks to a woman who believes her brother is wrongly accused and there are many discussions of him possibly helping her cope with it should her brother be guilty.

He speaks of doing what is right; his morality is unimpeachable; people are driven to confess to him.

No one, not even doctors, face chaos in modern life (or is it just pop culture?) as do detectives.

But often this is coupled with isolation. More than a priest, a detective may be closer to a shaman: appeasing the capricious spirit of justice, descending into the depths, completely alone.

Also, chain lightning. Ok, maybe tasers? So they’re enhance maybe, dual wield something something.

I also admit I like all the Spitfires. I’d kvell for some Lysander footage. I would.

Working

Funny. When I was young I thought everything was talent and creativity and I felt helpless, no matter how many times I was told I was talented and creative.

Being told to just keep working–well. At least it’s something I can do, something I can control.

The Guns of August/Tuchman

I’m not going to try to seem cool and say I didn’t like the movie–I did–but I never got the fascination with the Titanic. As a tragic marker of the end of an era it never worked for me, possibly because I was too familiar with the names Ypres, Marne, Somme.

The first chapter of this book does. Called “A funeral”, it is one of the most heartbreakingly lyrical pieces of historical writing I’ve ever experienced. The lists of royalty and leaders march in words like they had in the funeral procession of Edward VII in May of 1910.

The war never seemed so pointless or so inevitable than in those fourteen pages.